Sharon Evans wrote:Watched the video on that question and I still don't understand why it was voted down. I did come away with a question, John said the 497 was in the roundhouse and all it needs is the major FRA inspection to be done and it can operate again. I for some reason did not shoot the K37 that is sitting on that stub track with 483 and thought it was the 497.
Sharon Evans wrote:Watched the video on that question and I still don't understand why it was voted down. I did come away with a question, John said the 497 was in the roundhouse and all it needs is the major FRA inspection to be done and it can operate again. I for some reason did not shoot the K37 that is sitting on that stub track with 483 and thought it was the 497.
Larry Sullivan wrote:Sharon Evans wrote:Watched the video on that question and I still don't understand why it was voted down. I did come away with a question, John said the 497 was in the roundhouse and all it needs is the major FRA inspection to be done and it can operate again. I for some reason did not shoot the K37 that is sitting on that stub track with 483 and thought it was the 497.
I was trying to find a picture to verify, I believe 492 is in front of 483, I may be wrong but that's a number I have noted on some notes I have.
Roger Hogan wrote:Larry Sullivan wrote:Sharon Evans wrote:Watched the video on that question and I still don't understand why it was voted down. I did come away with a question, John said the 497 was in the roundhouse and all it needs is the major FRA inspection to be done and it can operate again. I for some reason did not shoot the K37 that is sitting on that stub track with 483 and thought it was the 497.
I was trying to find a picture to verify, I believe 492 is in front of 483, I may be wrong but that's a number I have noted on some notes I have.
I am thinking you are correct.
Sharon Evans wrote:From Google Earth, that, is I think, the tender of 483 that I have circled.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests